GHR-15 Questions? False Claims & Further Legal Issues
GHR-15 Questions?
False Claims and Legal Issues
GHR won’t make you look or feel younger, stronger, improve your sexual prowess, stop your hair from falling out, or have any positive effect on health issues.
--> Just Click Here
---> Dr. Randall West interviewed by Tom Cormier about GHR Platinum. Dr. West is a retired DO (Osteopathic physician) from California. His license # 5262. He retired in 2017 after what was reported as a back injury.
In the Summer of 2005, Health Canada finally issued a public warning to consumers about GHR-15. Dozens of media outlets, newspapers, and health organizations repeated or linked to the HC warning. The Canadian government never criminally charged Mr. Beemer or his company.
FTC FAILED TO TAKE ACTION AGAINST BIE HEALTH PRODUCTS CANADA
After many months of useless sparring with Trueman Tuck, the FTC tossed it over to their NAD (National Advertising Division) for action and comments. On June 15, 2006 they released a short statement about BIE Health Products total refusal to cooperate with any of their requests to prove their claims.
Here is what the NAD said:
"NAD was disappointed that the advertiser declined to participate in this
self-regulatory proceeding, especially in light of the strong health-related
claims being made in the advertising"
They referred the case back to the FTC and the FDA where absolutely nothing has been done since 2006!
In April 2009, the Council For Responsible Nutrition filed a detailed complaint about GHR advertising "Choose Life Grow Young with HGH" and "Reverse Aging Miracle" that had appeared in Northwest Airlines in-flight magazine in March 2009. It's blue ad is featured at the top of this blog. They asked questions of the NAD about why nothing had been done to stop their false advertising.
But, the FTC did take action against many other scammers who promoted HGH releaser products. The best example is their action against Great American Products, Physicians Choice and Michael Teplisky who flooded the Internet and AM radio stations nationwide with informercials hawking their products for years.
Read the transcript included in their decision along with their ads.
More actions were taken against companies that sold HGH releaser products by the FTC. But, none of them are based here in Canada. The FTC never attacked our Burlington, Ontario based BIE Health Products that had their own web sites and had their U.S. GHR-15 made and shipped their GHR-15 from the U.S. to Canadian customers. In other words, the U.S, government did nothing to stop BIE's source of GHR-15 from being made there, and then shipped to Canada.
FTC Stops International Spamming Enterprise that Sold Bogus Hoodia and Human Growth Hormone Pills - October 10, 2007
FTC Targets Bogus Anti-Aging Claims for Pills and Sprays Promising Human Growt Hormone Benefits - June 9, 2005
July 29, 2004
From Making Baseless Health Claims - February 25, 2020
Judge Agrees with FTC, Orders Spammers to Pay More Than $2.5 Million and Stop Selling Bogus Weight-Loss and Anti-Aging Products -
February 4, 2008
CREAGHAN A. HARRY,
individually and doing business as
HITECH MARKETING,
SCIENTIFIC LIFE NUTRITION, and
REJUVENATION HEALTH COW., - June 2005
ALTERNATIVE HORMONE REPLACEMENT THERAPY PRODUCTS Before the US SENATESPECIAL COMMITTEE ON AGING
Washington, DC - April 19, 2007
Court Orders Permanent Halt to Illegal Spamming, Bogus Claims - September 20, 2005 This action was taken against Australian spammer. If they took action against this company, then why didn't they go after BIE Health Products Canadian-based company?
Since then, the FTC has gone after a number of other fraudulent vendors. Health Canada has tried to block the sale of GHR-15 successfully here, but there are scores of other companies who continue to market GHR type products around the world.
Again, the main problem here in Canada is the total lack of speed in bringing our case to a successful conclusion. Thousands of documents have been presented, hundreds of thousands of dollars expended to defend ourselves! 18+ years is a very long time to wait for justice here in Canada!
What is my most likely legal defense against Richard Beemer?
This next section was researched using Microsoft CoPilot:
The litigation began after Dr. Terry Polevoy, a retired pediatrician and prominent Canadian health fraud investigator, used his website (Healthwatcher.net) to critique and expose the marketing claims of GHR-15. GHR-15 was a product sold by BIE Health Products that was marketed as a "growth hormone releaser" capable of anti-aging effects.
- Polevoy publicly documented what he claimed were false and unsubstantiated health assertions made by the company.
- In response, BIE Health Products launched a massive, multi-million dollar libel and product disparagement lawsuit against Dr. Polevoy, his website, and his internet service provider (ISP).
- Traditional Defamation Defenses: The defense was built around the conventional pillars of Canadian defamation law, primarily fair comment and truth/justification. Because public health and the efficacy of unapproved medical supplements are matters of public interest, the defense argued that a consumer advocate had the right to scrutinize corporate health claims.
- Financial Disparity: A well-funded commercial health entity was able to leverage a multi-million dollar lawsuit to impose immense financial and psychological stress on a single, independent advocate.
- Exhaustion Over Merits: The litigation dragged on through procedural motions and case management for years, highlighting how easily a plaintiff could use the legal system to drain an opponent’s resources without ever bringing the case to a final trial.
- Note: Decades later, Dr. Polevoy successfully utilized Ontario's actual anti-SLAPP legislation in an entirely separate, high-profile 2022 case ($6.8M libel suit Gill v. MacIver), where he and other scientists successfully got a COVID-19 misinformation lawsuit thrown out by the Ontario Superior Court.
- Severe Financial Penalties for Weaponizing the Courts: Ontario’s anti-SLAPP rules include a statutory presumption that a successful defendant is entitled to full compensation for their legal fees. In medical misinformation cases, courts have used this tool aggressively to punish plaintiffs who use litigation to suppress scientific dissent
- In the Gill v. Maciver case, the court not only dismissed the multi-million dollar defamation claim but also ordered the plaintiff doctor to pay over $1.1 million in legal costs to the defendants. This sends a definitive warning that using courts to silence scientific critics is an incredibly risky and expensive endeavor
Dr. Terry Polevoy links:
Severe Financial Penalties for Weaponizing the Courts:
Ontario’s anti-SLAPP rules include a statutory presumption that a successful defendant is entitled to full compensation for their legal fees. In medical misinformation cases, courts have used this tool aggressively to punish plaintiffs who use litigation to suppress scientific dissent- Book of documents - A list of Dr. Polevoy's activities, social media appearances, newspaper and magazine columns, letters to the editor, TV and radio appearances about his involvement in his local community and his support of science-based medicine. It is noted that he has always faced quackery and misinformation with bang-on opinions. He's worked with many others who focus their efforts to expose fraudulent claims, and scam products. He especially targeted those who ripped people off, especially when people face life-threatening conditions, like cancer, multiple sclerosis, and other debilitating diseases.
- This list will be updated and presented to the Superior Court Ontario in Toronto when he challenges this case using anti-SLAPP appeal.
- What you can expect from this blog:
- Book of documents - A list of Dr. Polevoy's activities, social media appearances, newspaper and magazine columns, letters to the editor, TV and radio appearances about his involvement in his local community and his support of science-based medicine. It is noted that he has always faced quackery and misinformation with bang-on opinions. He's worked with many others who focus their efforts to expose fraudulent claims, and scam products. He especially targeted those who ripped people off, especially when people face life-threatening conditions, like cancer, multiple sclerosis, and other debilitating diseases.
- This list will be updated and presented to the Superior Court Ontario in Toronto when he challenges this case using anti-SLAPP appeal.
We will attempt to profile major events in the BIE lawsuit here in Canada over the last 18 years. The case has still not been heard in a proper court of law. However, additional Affidavits by both the plaintiff and the defendants were submitted in September 2021.
The Plaintiff's attorney seems bent on drawing out the lawsuit at each and every turn. Meanwhile, their own GHR-15 remains banned for sale here in Canada. However, BIE has continued to advertised in Canadian magazines on a regular basis, including Zoomer Magazine, and Old Farmer's Almanac using their Burlington address.
Dr. Zoltan Rona's "contributions" to the BIE lawsuit
Dr. Rona has had a very interesting history, starting with his involvement for a few years with the Church of Scientology in the late 70s and early 80s. He then became a rather well-known author and started marketing all sorts of products himself on the Internet.
The Tribunal stated, "you displayed a serious lack of knowledge, skill and judgment when, for several months, you failed to recognize the severity of a patient's symptoms and associated condition, and the need for immediate medical attention."
Superior Court Ontario recent decision:
Expert Witness requested:
If anyone would like to help file a brief with the court, that would be very much welcomed. Just contact me below to help.
Requests from the public
We appeal to anyone who has ever bought or used any products like GHR-15 to contribute to the defense of our position. Let us know what they promised you and if they delivered on their claims. It would also be nice to hear from anyone in Canada and the U.S. who has filed an official complaint against any company that has marketed products like this.
Support for the defense of Dr. Polevoy's lawsuit can be sent to him via
E-transfer to: drpolevoy@yahoo.com
Thanks a million.


Comments
Post a Comment